Legal News

Break pre-conditions must be clear (Goldman Sachs v Procession House)

Break pre-conditions must be clear (Goldman Sachs v Procession House)
Published on: 12 July 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Break pre-conditions must be clear (Goldman Sachs v Procession House)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What were the arguments involved?
  • What did the court decide?
  • What of the other arguments?
  • Removal of fixtures
  • Commercial common sense
  • Contra proferentem
  • Case details

Article summary

Property analysis: The court decided that, on the wording of a tenant’s break clause, it was a pre-condition that the tenant provided vacant possession, but not that it had to comply with a separate yielding up clause that included an obligation to reinstate the premises. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents