- Break pre-conditions must be clear (Goldman Sachs v Procession House)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What were the arguments involved?
- What did the court decide?
- What of the other arguments?
- Removal of fixtures
- Commercial common sense
- Contra proferentem
- Case details
Property analysis: The court decided that, on the wording of a tenant’s break clause, it was a pre-condition that the tenant provided vacant possession, but not that it had to comply with a separate yielding up clause that included an obligation to reinstate the premises.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial