Legal News

Bowlplex owners fail to pin their losses on shadow director

Published on: 21 November 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Bowlplex owners fail to pin their losses on shadow director
  • What was the background?
  • What duties does a shadow director owe to the company?
  • What did the court decide?
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • Case details

Article summary

Corporate analysis: In Standish and others v Royal Bank of Scotland plc (RBS) and another, the High Court considered whether the defendants achieved an unconscionable purpose by unlawful means, through a breach of fiduciary duty by an employee of the second defendant who assumed the status of shadow director of the claimants’ company. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents