Legal News

Barter Re Ivy House—Upper Tribunal refuses to discharge recently imposed covenant

Published on: 27 November 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Barter Re Ivy House—Upper Tribunal refuses to discharge recently imposed covenant
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What were the facts of the case?
  • What were the main legal arguments arising?
  • Why did the UT decide not to exercise its discretion to discharge the covenant?
  • To what extent is the judgment helpful and what practical lessons are there to be learned?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property analysis: The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UT) refused to exercise its discretion under Law of Property Act 1925, s 84(1) (LPA 1925) to discharge a covenant where the application was made by the original covenantor less than four years after the covenant was entered into. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents