- Assessing the value of factual evidence in clinical negligence cases (Taylor v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust)
- What are the practical implications of this decision?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide? In particular, what was the decision on the evidence point?
Personal Injury analysis: Farrah Mauladad, barrister at Crown Office Chambers, discusses the practical implications of the recent judgment in Taylor v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust concerning a clinical negligence claim brought more than 26 years after the alleged injury. The court’s decision on liability largely depended on the assessment of the factual and, to a lesser degree, expert evidence.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial