Legal News

Arbitration weekly highlights—25 June 2020

Arbitration weekly highlights—25 June 2020
Published on: 25 June 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Arbitration weekly highlights—25 June 2020
  • In this issue:
  • Arbitration under the AA 1996
  • Court of Appeal—arbitrability—CA 2006
  • State immunity—service out—appointment of arbitrator
  • Enforcement—public policy
  • Substantive jurisdiction challenge—authority and contract interpretation
  • Substantive jurisdiction and serious irregularity challenges—correction of award
  • Commercial Court Users Group
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • More...

Article summary

This week's edition of Arbitration weekly highlights includes in-depth coverage of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision on arbitrability and four Commercial Court decisions: first, a rejection of Spain’s application, made pursuant to CPR 11 and based on state immunity grounds, to set aside a court order granting the claimant mutual shipowners’ insurance association permission to serve an arbitration claim form out of the jurisdiction; secondly, a rejection of an attempt to set aside an order enforcing an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitral award on public policy grounds; thirdly, a successful substantive jurisdiction challenge brought under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) against a final award on jurisdiction; and, fourthly, an unsuccessful challenge to an addendum to an ICC arbitral award that was made following an application under Article 35 of the ICC Arbitration Rules. We also bring you more practical guidance on dealing with the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on arbitration proceedings, this time focusing on advocacy in virtual hearings. All this, and more, in our weekly highlights. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents