Legal News

Appeals—late respondent notices (Pipe v Spicerhaart Estate Agents)

Appeals—late respondent notices (Pipe v Spicerhaart Estate Agents)
Published on: 21 January 2016
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Appeals—late respondent notices (Pipe v Spicerhaart Estate Agents)
  • Practical implications
  • Facts
  • What did the court decide?
  • Court details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: In refusing a retrospective extension of time for filing of a respondent’s notice of appeal, Sweeney J has confirmed that the principles in CPR 3.9 on relief from sanctions as enunciated in Denton will be applied by the court. The respondent was debarred from relying at the appeal hearing on any matters which should have been included in the respondent’s notice. This decision is of interest to practitioners advising a respondent in receipt of an appeal notice. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents