- Appeal dismissed in Puma case (EUIPO v Puma)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
IP analysis: The Court of Justice has dismissed an appeal by the EUIPO in relation to a General Court finding that the EUIPO should have taken into account, as evidence, three of the EUIPO’s previous decisions concerning the reputation of earlier marks registered by Puma SE (Puma) in opposition proceedings based upon Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009. The Court of Justice held that there had been no error of law in the General Court’s approach.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial