Legal News

Appeal allowed on point of law because the FtT failed to address evidence provided by the Local Authority (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v KS and another (SEN) (Special educational needs—other))

Appeal allowed on point of law because the FtT failed to address evidence provided by the Local Authority (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v KS and another (SEN) (Special educational needs—other))
Published on: 01 August 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Appeal allowed on point of law because the FtT failed to address evidence provided by the Local Authority (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v KS and another (SEN) (Special educational needs—other))
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Local Government analysis: The case London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v KS and another (SEN) (Special educational needs—other) considers the effects of the First Tier Tribunal (FtT) failing to address evidence provided before them when making a decision. The Upper Tribunal contended that an appeal would be allowed on a point of law based on the failure to address evidence, but emphasised that the decision to allow the appeal had no implication as to the eventual outcome of the case. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents