- Appeal against the striking out of a malicious falsehood claim dismissed (Tinkler v Ferguson)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
TMT analysis: The Court of Appeal has upheld a decision of Mr Justice Nicklin to strike out a malicious falsehood claim as a collateral attack on earlier findings, in rare circumstances where the earlier decision involved different parties. Written by Phillip Patterson, barrister, Hardwicke.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial