Table of contents
- Original news
- What does this decision tell us about the lasting effect of an anonymity order following the death of the subject?
- How did the court approach the issue of continued confidentiality of information gathered during litigation throughout their lifetime after a person’s death?
- What are the practical implications of this decision?
- How might this decision affect future cases?
- Does this decision offer any practical advice?
Article summary
Private Client analysis: Alison Easton of Coram Chambers examines the Court of Protection’s power to preserve the anonymity of a person posthumously following the decision in Press Association v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial