Legal News

AG opines on scope of review by General Court (Primart v EUIPO)

Published on: 28 November 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • AG opines on scope of review by General Court (Primart v EUIPO)
  • What are the practical implications of this opinion?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the AG opine?
  • Case details

Article summary

IP analysis: The Advocate General has opined that the Court of Justice should uphold an appeal against a decision of the General Court in opposition proceedings, on the basis that the General Court had erred in law in its application of Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009. The General Court had held that certain arguments made by the trade mark applicant in relation to the inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark relied on in the proceedings were inadmissible because they had not been put forward before the Board of Appeal. However, the Advocate General opined that a failure to take into account relevant factors when assessing the distinctiveness of the earlier mark constituted an error of law which could properly be challenged before the General Court. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents