Legal News

AG opines on consideration of supplementary evidence in trade mark cases (mobile.de GmbH v EUIPO and Rezon)

AG opines on consideration of supplementary evidence in trade mark cases (mobile.de GmbH v EUIPO and Rezon)
Published on: 24 November 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • AG opines on consideration of supplementary evidence in trade mark cases (mobile.de GmbH v EUIPO and Rezon)
  • What are the practical implications of this opinion?
  • What was this opinion about?
  • What did the AG decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

IP analysis: Advocate General (AG) Sharpston has opined on whether Articles 64 and 76(2) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation permit exercise of the discretion to take account of supplementary evidence in circumstances where the Board of Appeal remits a case to the relevant European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) division. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents