- Admissibility of expert evidence and potential conflicts of interest (EXP v Barker)
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What issues did this case raise?
- To what extent is the judgment helpful in clarifying the law in this area?
- What are the implications for practitioners? What will they need to be mindful of when advising in this area? Any best practice tips?
- Are there still any unresolved issues practitioners will need to watch out for? If so, how can they avoid any possible pitfalls?
Personal Injury analysis: The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s rejection of evidence of an expert witness in the medical negligence case of EXP v Barker. Grahame Aldous QC and Stuart McKechnie of 9 Gough Square, barristers, who acted for the respondent in the case, review the decision.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial