Legal News

Administration, sale of assets, brand licensing, breach of contract, implied terms (In re Force India Formula One Team Ltd—Stichd v Rowley and Baker)

Published on: 10 May 2022
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Administration, sale of assets, brand licensing, breach of contract, implied terms (In re Force India Formula One Team Ltd—Stichd v Rowley and Baker)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court has held that it was necessary to imply into a brand licence agreement, a term which required the owner of a sporting team to continue to operate it throughout the entire term of the agreement. This judgment contains a helpful review of the leading authorities establishing the principles governing implied contractual terms. The decision serves as a useful example of how the court should approach the application of the relevant principles. Written by Jamie Riley QC, 3 Verulam Buildings. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents