- Adjudicator’s own programming analysis was not breach of natural justice (RGB P&C v Victory House)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- EOT claim
- Sub-contractor claims
- Case details
Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court held that an adjudicator’s decision was enforceable, and had not been made in breach of principles of natural justice. In doing so, the court rejected allegations that the adjudicator had reached a conclusion as to an extension of time (EOT) claim on the basis of his own analysis, without recourse to the parties, or that he had failed to consider a defence.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial