Legal News

Adjudication clauses and consumer protection legislation (Beach Homes v Hazell)

Adjudication clauses and consumer protection legislation (Beach Homes v Hazell)
Published on: 26 July 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Adjudication clauses and consumer protection legislation (Beach Homes v Hazell)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • The first argument: failure to act in accordance with the notice of intention to refer
  • The second argument: incorrect construction of the variation clauses
  • The third argument: unfairness?
  • The fourth argument: wrong in any event
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court dismissed an application by the defendants (two private individuals) to set aside a judgment entered in default following the defendants’ failure to file an acknowledgement of service in enforcement proceedings for an adjudication/expert determination. In doing so, the court noted that an adjudication clause in a residential building contract was not unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCR). Robert Scrivener at 4 Pump Court Chambers considers the judgment and its practical implications. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents