- AA 1996, s 67 challenge to investment treaty arbitration award dismissed (Republic of Korea v Dayyani)
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Arbitration analysis: Mr Justice Butcher, in the Commercial Court, dismissed the Republic of Korea’s challenge to an investment treaty arbitration award made pursuant to section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) on grounds that the tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction over the claims made by the defendants (the Dayyanis) in the underlying London-seated, ad hoc arbitration conducted in accordance with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial