- A shift in the interpretation of fundamental dishonesty (Basir v Larisadeh)
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- What are the practical implications of this case?
Personal Injury analysis: Phillip Melia, solicitor at Horwich Farrelly, examines a Central London County Court appeal decision in Basir v Larisadeh that prevents courts misinterpreting legislation and making decisions with ‘perverse results’ that saw some claimants rewarded—even after they were found to be dishonest.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial