Legal News

A shift in the interpretation of fundamental dishonesty (Basir v Larisadeh)

Published on: 30 April 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • A shift in the interpretation of fundamental dishonesty (Basir v Larisadeh)
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • What are the practical implications of this case?

Article summary

Personal Injury analysis: Phillip Melia, solicitor at Horwich Farrelly, examines a Central London County Court appeal decision in Basir v Larisadeh that prevents courts misinterpreting legislation and making decisions with ‘perverse results’ that saw some claimants rewarded—even after they were found to be dishonest. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents