Legal News

1995 Act arguments fail to validate break notice served by unregistered assignee (Sackville v Robertson)

Published on: 06 February 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • 1995 Act arguments fail to validate break notice served by unregistered assignee (Sackville v Robertson)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What were the facts of the case?
  • What were the issues involved?
  • What did the court decide?
  • What were the court’s findings on the first issue?
  • What were the landlord’s arguments on the first issue?
  • What were the tenant’s arguments on the first issue?
  • What were the arguments pursuant to LT(C)A 1995?
  • More...

Article summary

Property analysis: An assignee who had yet to be registered had not been entitled to serve a break notice. The existing law on the ‘registration gap’ was applied and new arguments involving the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 did not succeed. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents