(1) Where an application is made to a local planning authority for planning permission—
(a) subject to [section 62D(5) and] sections 91 and 92, they may grant planning permission, either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as they think fit; or
(b) they may refuse planning permission.
[(1A) Where an application is made to a local planning authority for permission in principle—
(a) they may grant permission in principle; or
(b) they may refuse permission in principle.]
(2) In dealing with [an application for planning permission or permission in principle] the authority shall have regard [to—
(a) the provisions of the development plan, so far as material to the application,
[(aza) a post-examination draft neighbourhood development plan, so far as material to the application,]
[(aa) any considerations relating to the use of the Welsh language, so far as material to the application,]
(b) any local finance considerations, so far as material to the application, and
(c) any other material considerations].
[(2ZZA) The authority must determine an application for technical details consent in accordance with the relevant permission in principle.
This is subject to subsection (2ZZC).
(2ZZB) An application for technical details consent is an application for planning permission that—
(a) relates to land in respect of which permission in principle is in force,
(b) proposes development all of which falls within the terms of the permission in principle, and
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It
Criminal damageGeneralSimple criminal damage is triable either way unless the value of the alleged damage is £5,000 or less, in which case the offence will be treated as if it were triable only summarily.Where the damage is caused by fire or the racially aggravated form of the offence is charged,
Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and
Interim injunctions—the American Cyanamid guidelinesThis Practice Note is concerned with substantive interim injunctions, which are a particular species of injunction granted on a temporary basis ahead of trial. As set out below, there are different considerations depending on whether the interim
0330 161 1234