[(1) This section applies to samples—
(a) taken from a person under any power conferred by this Part of this Act, or
(b) taken by the police, with the consent of the person from whom they were taken, in connection with the investigation of an offence by the police.
(2) Samples to which this section applies must be destroyed if it appears to the responsible chief officer of police that—
(a) the taking of the samples was unlawful, or
(b) the samples were taken from a person in connection with that person's arrest and the arrest was unlawful or based on mistaken identity.
(3) Subject to this, the rule in subsection (4) or (as the case may be) (5) applies.
(4) A DNA sample to which this section applies must be destroyed—
(a) as soon as a DNA profile has been derived from the samp
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note addresses issues when serving out of the jurisdiction and the permission of the court is required. It explains how to make an application and the form of order required. An application to serve out of the jurisdiction is generally made without notice and on the papers. Key
How is the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) different from a typical occupational pension scheme?In this Practice Note, references to the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) Order are to the National Employment Savings Trust Order 2010, SI 2010/917 (NEST Order) applicable from 25 May
In a business-to-business contract where a contractual long-stop date has passed but the parties wish to continue with the contract, should they document their intention to continue or enter into a new contract?Long-stop dateAs stated in the Drafting Notes to clause: Long-stop date definition, the
Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be
0330 161 1234