(1) An employee may present a complaint to an [employment tribunal] that his employer has failed to permit him to take time off as required by section 50.
(2) An [employment tribunal] shall not consider a complaint under this section that an employer has failed to permit an employee to take time off unless it is presented—
(a) before the end of the period of three months beginning with the date on which the failure occurred, or
(b) within such further period as the tribunal considers reasonable in a case where it is satisfied that it
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
notice of [assignment OR transfer]To: [insert name of landlord][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert number]][and][To: [insert name of head landlord]][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert
Debt for equity swapsA popular restructuring method is a debt for equity swap; financial creditors receive equity in the restructured vehicle in return for reducing or cancelling their debt claims against the company (and the rest of the group).Many highly levered deals have thin equity cushions and
While this Practice Note primarily covers commercial property matters, it also touches on residential considerations.Time is generally not of the essence for completion of a contract for the sale of land. If the seller or the buyer delays completion, the defaulting party will be liable in damages
Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and
0330 161 1234