The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c 60) is amended as follows.
(1) Section 37 (duties of custody officers before charge) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (7) for paragraphs (a) and (b) there is substituted—
“(a) shall be released without charge and on bail for the purpose of enabling the Director of Public Prosecutions to make a decision under section 37B below,
(b) shall be released without charge and on bail but not for that purpose,
(c) shall be released without charge and without bail, or
(d) shall be charged.”
(3) After that subsection there is inserted—
“(7A) The decision as to how a person is to be dealt with under subsection (7) above shall be that of the custody officer.
(7B) Where a person is released under subsection (7)(a) above, it shall be the duty of the custody officer to inform him that he is being released to enable the Director of Public Prosecutions to make a decision under section 37B below.”
(4) In subsection (8)(a) after “ (7)(b)” there is inserted “or (c)”.
After that section there is inserted—
(1) The Director of Public Prosecutions may issue guidance—
(a) for the purpose of enabling custody officers to decide how persons should be dealt with under section 37(7) above or 37C(2) below, and
(b) as to the information to be sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions under section 37B(1) below.
(2) The Director of Public Prosecutions may from time to time revise guidance issued under this section.
(3) Custody officers are to have regard to
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Overlapping insurance policesThere are various reasons why an insured may end up with overlapping insurance cover, whether deliberately or otherwise.Examples include the situation where the insured takes the benefit of other insurance arranged by another party or where, in the commercial world, risk
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
Deceit—what is it?A deceit occurs when a misrepresentation is made with the express intention of defrauding a party, subsequently causing loss to that party.The elements of a claim in deceit are:•a clear false representation of fact or law•fraud by the maker, in the sense that they knew that the
0330 161 1234
To view the latest version of this document and millions of others like it, sign-in to LexisLibrary or register for a free trial.