The following Wills & Probate guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The family home will, in most cases, form a disproportionately large part of the value of family assets. This will provoke a number of issues, among the most important being:
its value may cause a significant IHT problem in its own right, as well as a significant contribution to the overall IHT burden
there will be a natural desire for the property to remain in the ownership of a surviving spouse or one or more children
It is because the value of the family home will often result in an IHT liability, even when two nil rate bands are available, that in past years, there have been various arrangements created by legal and taxation practitioners to exploit loopholes in tax legislation. HM Revenue and Customs have consistently responded by introducing anti-avoidance legislation to prevent the use of such arrangements. Examples include the anti-Eversden legislation introduced by Finance Act 2006 into section 102(5A)–(5C) of the Finance Act 1986 (FA 1986) following the House of Lords decision in IRC v Eversden, the anti-Ingram legislation introduced by section 104 of the Finance Act 1999 into FA 1986, s 102A to reverse the Court of Appeal decision in Ingram v IRC on the reservation of benefit rule (GWR) and the pre-owned asset tax (POAT) introduced by section 84 of the Finance Act 2004, which had a
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234