The following Employment Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
There is no requirement for a claimant to wait until a grievance procedure is completed before bringing an employment tribunal claim.
Claims in the employment tribunal are required to be brought within certain time limits (the nature of the claim will determine the time limit and the relevant date from which time starts to run). A claimant will, therefore, want to ensure they comply with the relevant time limits for bringing a claim, including complying with the requirement for early conciliation, which applies to most claims. Compliance with an internal procedure, such a grievance procedure, will generally not affect the relevant date from which time starts to run for time limit purposes.
If a claim is presented late, and the claimant's reason for presenting it late is because they were waiting for the completion of the internal procedures, an employment tribunal may take this into account when deciding whether or not to grant an extension of time for just and equitable reasons, ie the test that applies to claims under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). It is, however, only one factor to be considered among others, and not determinative in and of itself.
For further information, see Practice Note: Time limits for presenting employment tribunal claims.
In relation to the submission of the respondent's ET3, response form, the normal time
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Unlike many other countries, the UK has no unfair competition law. Brand owners seeking to prevent competitors from marketing ‘copycat’ products or using misleading advertising have to rely on a combination of different intellectual property rights. These rights include the common law right to
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
STOP PRESS: The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contains provisions which, on a temporary basis (presently until 31 December 2020) impose significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For further reading, see Practice Note: Corporate
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.