The following Restructuring & Insolvency Q&A provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
STOP PRESS: From 6 April 2017, the Insolvency Rules 1986, SI 1986/1925 were revoked and replaced by the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024. The content in this Q&A may have been affected by this change.
A company in financial difficulties will inevitably have a number of creditors banging on the door for payment. While restructuring discussions are ongoing with creditors and in the absence of any formal insolvency process, there remains the risk that a creditor will present a winding-up petition at court in an attempt to force payment from the company. This will have consequences for any proposed restructuring as discussed in this Q&A.
There are a number of consequences of a winding up petition being presented at court by a creditor and in the context of a restructuring, the key consequences are:
Following the presentation of a winding-up petition at court (which has not been disposed of), the company and the directors of the company are prevented from appointing an administrator using the out-of-court route under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). If the parties wish to appoint an administrator to the company as part of any proposed restructuring and wish to use the out-of-court route, the only party able to do this would be
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
What are OFTOs?Offshore Transmission Owners (OFTOs) are the owners of offshore transmission assets which connect offshore wind farms to the onshore electricity network. The transmission assets comprise everything between the offshore point of connection with the generating wind farm assets and the
What is a company's constitution?A company’s 'constitution' is defined under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) as including:•the company’s articles of association, and•any resolutions and agreements affecting a company’s constitutionThe CA 2006 definition of 'constitution' is not exhaustive and also
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.