The following IP practice note Produced in partnership with Boyes Turner LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This practice note provides an overview of the main types of dispute resolution that are an alternative to litigation. As well as covering the main types of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as conciliation, mediation, arbitration and expert determination, this note considers the advantages and disadvantages of ADR over litigation and provides practical points relevant to ADR.
Litigation can be a costly and lengthy process producing uncertain results. For that reason alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an attractive way of resolving all types of disputes, where informal negotiation has failed, including those relating to intellectual property (IP). ADR refers to mechanisms which sit outside the court system and enables parties to resolve their disputes with the assistance of neutral intermediaries.
Types of ADR include:
ADR can be used to resolve issues relating to all types of IP from patents to domain names. It is relevant to any type of dispute, including alleged infringements, disagreements over licensing and disputes relating to development or even settlement agreements. See Practice Note: Which form of ADR?.
Conciliation is not very different to a straightforward negotiation between the parties. The key difference is that a conciliator will be appointed to assist both parties independently and help them to identify:
their main objectives, and
areas where concessions to the other side may be possible
Generally the parties
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
ContractWhere a contract is made by two or more parties it may contain a promise or obligation made by two or more of those parties. Any such promise may be:•joint•several, or•joint and severalWhether an undertaking is joint, several, or joint and several in contract is a question of construction
When is quantum meruit and quantum valebat relevant?Claims in quantum meruit (value of services) and quantum valebat (value of goods) arise in diverse situations ranging from where contractual terms are silent on issues of payment to where there is no contract at all (Serck v Drake & Scull).General
Coronavirus (COVID-19): During the current pandemic, legislation and changes to practice and procedure in the courts and tribunals have been introduced, which affect the following:•proceedings for possession•forfeiture of business leases on the grounds of non-payment of rent•a landlord's right to
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.