The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Limitation Act 1980 is referred to as LA 1980.
LA 1980 sets out the time limits within which claimants are entitled to bring claims of various types.
In general terms, a defendant will have a complete defence to any claim that is brought after the expiry of the time limit applicable to it. After expiry of the relevant limitation period, the claim is said to be statute barred.
The purpose of the limitation period is to prevent injustice to a defendant being presented with a stale claim that it did not expect to have to deal with.
The LA 1980 will apply to the vast majority of personal injury claims, whether arising from accidents or from contraction of a disease. The ordinary limitation period for personal injury claims is governed by the provisions set out at LA 1980, ss 11 and 14.
In a claim for personal injury governed by LA 1980, s 11(4) provides, subject to a limited exception (where a claimant dies before the expiry of the period), that the period applicable is three years from:
the date on which the cause of action accrued, or
the date of knowledge (if later) of the person injured
NOTE: Practitioners should be alive to those personal injury claims to which LA 1980 does not apply. For those claims, see Time limits under the Limitation Act 1980—personal injury
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
An ad hoc arbitration is any arbitration in which the parties have not selected an institution to administer the arbitration. This offers parties flexibility as to the conduct of the arbitration, but less external support for the process. It can be quicker than institutional arbitration but not if
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.