The following Insurance & Reinsurance practice note Produced in partnership with HFW provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (TP(RAI)A 2010) repeals and replaces the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (TP(RAI)A 1930). The purpose of TP(RAI)A 1930 was to ensure that, where an insured had incurred an insured liability to a third party but subsequently became insolvent, the insurance money would be paid to the third party rather than become an asset in the insolvency to be shared amongst all the insured's creditors.
Like its predecessor, TP(RAI)A 2010 transfers to the third party some of the insolvent insured's rights under the insurance policy and allows the third party to bring proceedings directly against the insurer.
The key change in TP(RAI)A 2010 is that a third party can now bring proceedings directly against the insurer or seek information about the insurance position at an early stage, without first establishing the liability of the insured.
TP(RAI)A 2010 was drafted following a consultation by the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission in 2001. The Law Commissions identified the following issues with TP(RAI)A 1930:
the third party had to establish the liability of the insured and the quantum of the insured loss before being able to bring proceedings against the insurer. This resulted in multiple sets of proceedings
if the insured was a dissolved company which had been struck off the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
Company directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their services will need to be
Overlapping insurance policesThere are various reasons why an insured may end up with overlapping insurance cover, whether deliberately or otherwise.Examples include the situation where the insured takes the benefit of other insurance arranged by another party or where, in the commercial world, risk
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.