The following Planning guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The legal principles applicable to construing a planning permission were summarised in Ashford BC ex parte Shepway DC and qualified in Barnett v SoS, as follows:
the general rule is that in construing a planning permission which is clear, unambiguous and valid on its face, regard may only be had to the planning permission itself, including the conditions (if any) on it and the express reasons for those conditions (see Slough BC v SoS and Miller-Mead v MHLG)
this rule excludes reference to the planning application as well as to other extrinsic evidence, unless the planning permission incorporates the application by reference. In that situation the application is treated as having become part of the permission. The reason for normally not having regard to the application is that the public should be able to rely on a document which is plain on its face without having to consider whether there is any discrepancy between the permission and the application (Slough BC v SoS; Wilson v West Sussex CC and Slough Estates v Slough BC).
However, this particular principle was qualified in Barnett v SoS, where the Court of Appeal noted that Ashford BC ex parte Shepway DC concerned the interpretation
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234