The following Construction guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This article appears as originally published in Construction Law on 1 December 2014 and is not maintained.
A variety of defences are available against claims involving the use of set-off or abatement. Martyn Naylor of 4 Pump Court explains how several different types can be used in different circumstances.
A party faced with a claim for payment may reduce or extinguish that claim by raising the defence of set-off
There are several different types of set-off, including legal and equitable set-off and abatement
Each form of set-off is available in slightly different circumstances, depending on the nature of the cross-claim and its relation to the claim itself
Contractual provisions may limit or expand the rights of set-off available to the parties
The Construction Act 1996, as amended, requires the paying party to serve a pay less notice or it will lose its right to raise matters of set-off or abatement
There are usually two sides to a construction dispute. A contractor might have a perfectly good claim for payment, but its employer may be aggrieved about delay or defective work. Alternatively, the party from whom payment is sought may be owed money under a separate contract. The respondent will want to ensure that its liability is extinguished or reduced as far as possible. It will therefore need to rely on
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234