The following PI & Clinical Negligence practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Limitation Act 1980 is referred to as LA 1980.
When dealing with personal injury claims that fall within LA 1980, s 11, the court has a discretion to disapply the primary limitation period even though a claim has not been brought in time (ie to allow the claim to continue even though more than three years elapsed before it was brought).
This discretion applies to all personal injury claims in negligence, nuisance and breach of duty. It also applies to claims in respect of defective products brought under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (but those are subject to a further long-stop limitation period of ten years that cannot be set aside).
The court should set limitation aside and let a claim proceed where it would be equitable to do so.
In considering whether it would in fact be equitable to allow an action to proceed, the court is obliged under LA 1980, s 33 to balance the degree to which both the claimant and defendant could be prejudiced by an extension of time. In a case where section 33 arises, the broad merits test will be a prominent consideration. LA 1980, s 33(3) also provides that the court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case, and in particular to the:
length of, and reasons for,
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The principle of transferred maliceIf a person has a malicious intent towards X and, in carrying out that intent, injures Y, he is guilty of an offence. So, if D shoots at A with intent to kill him but kills B by mistake it is murder; the mistake as to the identity of the victim is irrelevant as D
Facilitating the performance of a duty by public officialsFacilitation payments, also known as facilitating or grease payments, are generally small amounts of money paid to public officials or others as a means of ensuring that they perform their duty, whether more promptly or at all. In some
Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.