The following Property practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The ‘ad medium filum’ rule is a rebuttable presumption that an owner of land which abuts either:
a public or private highway, or
a non-tidal river or stream
also owns the soil of the adjoining highway, or the bed of the adjoining river or stream, up to its centre line. A transfer or lease of that land will therefore be presumed to include that part of the highway, river or stream without the necessity for any express mention of it.
In the case of a highway, the presumption is known as the ‘ad medium filum viae’ rule, and is based on a combination of convenience (so as to prevent disputes as to precise boundaries) and also on the supposition that each owner contributed a portion of land when the highway was formed. In the case of a river or stream, the rule is known as the ‘ad medium filum aquae’ rule, and appears to be based solely on convenience.
The presumption applies even though the land conveyed:
is marked on an accompanying plan with coloured edging which does not include the highway or river, or
is described as being ‘bounded by’ the highway or river, or
is stated (either in the body of the conveyance/transfer or on an accompanying plan) to have a particular measured area which cannot be
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What is rescission of a contract?The remedy of rescission is available to a party whose consent, in entering into a contract, has been invalidated in some way:•the effect of rescinding a contract is to extinguish it and restore the parties to their pre-contractual positions•the main grounds of
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
This Practice Note discusses the common law doctrine of privity of contract; the equitable and statutory exceptions to it; how the doctrine affects enforcing a contract against a third party and what happens when, notwithstanding the lack of privity, a contract has an indirect effect on a third
Disposal and devolutionThe equity of redemption arises as soon as the mortgage is made. It is an interest in the land which the mortgagor can:•transfer, lease or mortgage inter vivos, or•by will (it passes on intestacy)No cloggingIt is a fundamental principle of a mortgage that there must be no clog
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.