The following IP practice note Produced in partnership with Anne Fairpo of Temple Tax Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Where a business decides to hold its IP outside the UK, there are a number of tax issues that need to be considered. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the UK tax authorities will, generally, look quite closely at any transfer of IP by a UK business to a related party in a low-tax jurisdiction.
The countries that offer the best tax rates are generally described as tax havens (the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, etc). These have little or no corporate taxes but, as a result, usually have very few tax treaties as well. As a result, royalties paid to these locations from most higher-tax countries (most European countries, the USA, Japan, Australia, etc) will have tax withheld tax source on the gross royalty. The USA requires tax to be withheld on royalties at 30%; the UK requires withholding at 20%. These withholding taxes cannot be recovered, in a zero-tax country which means that a zero-tax country may result in a 20–30% effective tax rate overall.
As a result, where appropriate, IP will often be located in jurisdictions such as Ireland, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Malta, which have good treaty networks and favourable (although not always 0%) tax rates.
A transfer of IP from a UK company to a connected company offshore will be treated
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Statutory declaration of solvencyA company enters voluntary liquidation when the members of the company vote to do so by a special resolution. For more information, see Practice Note: What is a members' voluntary liquidation (MVL) and where/when is it typically used?Before the members can vote on a
When restructuring is considered rather than formal insolvency proceedings (see Practice Note: Benefits of restructuring over formal proceedings) the company may want to ensure that relevant creditors quickly enter a standstill agreement to gain some breathing space to consider a restructuring
This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.