The following Arbitration practice note Produced in partnership with Jo Delaney of Baker McKenzie provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the role of state immunity in relation to arbitration proceedings in Australia. For a general introduction to state immunity and arbitration, see Practice Note: State immunity and arbitration—general considerations. In addition, for Practice Notes on state immunity in a number of jurisdictions around the world (including England and Wales), see our State immunity subtopic: State immunity and arbitration—overview.
State immunity in Australia is governed by the Foreign States Immunities Act 1985 (Cth) (FSI Act). The FSI Act applies to civil litigation in Australian courts involving 'foreign states' (as defined in the Act). Prior to the enactment of the FSI Act, state immunity was governed by the common law.
Similar to the UK State Immunity Act 1978, the FSI Act provides exceptions to immunity for commercial transactions and commercial property.
The FSI Act provides a separate provision (FSI Act, s 17) that addresses immunity in relation to arbitration proceedings and enforcement of arbitral awards.
This Practice Note summarises the approach to state immunity under the FSI Act generally and then considers the approach to arbitration proceedings.
State immunity under the FSI Act applies to foreign states. FSI Act, s 3(3) provides that a reference to a 'foreign state' in the FSI Act includes a reference to:
a province, state, self-governing territory or other political subdivision of the foreign state
the head of state or head of a political subdivision of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Express and implied contractual terms distinguishedContractual terms may be either express or implied:•express terms—are terms which are actually recorded in a written contract or openly expressed in an oral contract at the time the contract is made (or there may be a combination of written and oral
On the disposition of a property (whether by way of conveyance, transfer or charge), the party making the disposition will normally provide a title guarantee which implies standard form covenants for title. A landlord may give a title guarantee when granting a lease, but this is rare in practice.
LiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary of State for
The Standard Conditions of Sale (SCS), currently in their 5th edition (2018 revision), are a set of standard conditions which are commonly incorporated into contracts for the sale of residential property. The Standard Commercial Property Conditions (Third Edition—2018 Revision) (SCPC) are used for
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.