The following Competition practice note Produced in partnership with CMS provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
State aid and public procurement are areas of law that both have their own rules. Despite considerable autonomy and distinction, however, both areas significantly overlap.
Such overlaps must be taken into account especially by contracting authorities in connection with the award of public contracts. This Practice Note focuses on circumstances and conditions which the contracting authority should consider to limit the risks of masked granting of State aid in the process of awarding public contracts.
The EU legal framework for public procurement is outlined in two public procurement and one concession directives.
These EU Directives cover tenders that are expected to be worth more than a given threshold. The core principles of these directives are transparency, equal treatment, non-discrimination, open competition, and sound procedural management. They are designed to achieve a procurement market that is competitive, open, and well-regulated.
Opposite the public procurement directives, which EU Member States had to transpose into national laws, State aid law falls exclusively within the competence of the relevant EU authorities, without the EU member states having to, or more precisely being at all able to, transpose such legislation in any manner whatsoever. In practice, this means that answers to questions about State aid and how to prevent unlawful provision of such aid should be sought in EU legislation and the respective case law.
The legal basis on which all interpretations of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
The offence of threats to killThe offence of threats to kill is an offence which can be tried in the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. The magistrates' court is likely to decline jurisdiction if there are repeated threats or a visible weapon.Elements of the offence of threats to killThe
Coronavirus (COVID-19): The guidance detailing normal practice set out in this Practice Note may be affected by measures concerning process and procedure in the civil courts that have been introduced as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. For guidance, see Practice Note: Coronavirus
This Practice Note provides guidance on the SRA Codes of Conduct, contained in the SRA Standards and Regulations, in force from 25 November 2019. The SRA Standards and Regulations include two Codes of Conduct—a Code forSolicitors, RELs and RFLs and a Code for Firms. The Standards and Regulations
The procedure for making an application to stay proceedings due to abuse of process is governed by the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015 (CrimPR), SI 2015/1490, r 3.20. For more information, see Practice Note: Abuse of process procedure.Staying a prosecution for abuse of processThe principle of abuse of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.