The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It considers how the test is applied in practice, the relevance of industry opinion and whether there can be an ‘acceptable range’ in assessing liability of the professional with reference to expert evidence.
The Practice Note also considers the standards of care expected of solicitors and barristers (see below), including consideration as to:
the scope of the retainer
the duty to warn (if any)
what happens when a client closes down discussion of a potential claim
solicitors and the Bowerman principle
solicitors and fraudulent property transactions
The Practice Note also considers the court’s approach in negligent financial mis-selling cases (see below).
The 1957 decision in Bolam v Friern Hospital has long stood as the accepted standard of care in professional negligence cases, as being that of ‘reasonable skill and care’. However, in 2015, the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health held that, at least in the medical context, the explaining of risks to a person to whom advice is given is no longer governed by the test in Bolam. Rather, the duty is normally:
‘To take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
Parliamentary committeesIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to
IP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an end and significant
AffrayAffray is an offence created by the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986). It can be tried in either the magistrates’ court or the Crown Court. The magistrates’ court may decline jurisdiction where for example in cases involving a weapon/throwing objects, or conduct that causes serious
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished
0330 161 1234