The following Family practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
The Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, 1.1 sets out the overriding objective, including that dealing with a case justly includes ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing. A Sears Tooth agreement may enable a spouse or civil partner who does not have the financial means to pay legal fees to obtain proper advice and representation within family proceedings. For alternative methods of funding, see also Practice Notes: Funding—legal services orders and costs allowances and Eligibility for family legal aid.
In Sears Tooth v Payne Hicks Beach, the court considered the validity of a deed of assignment in which the wife had agreed to assign her rights in any financial provision and costs orders (other than periodical payment orders). The court gave guidance as to the circumstances in which such an agreement would be appropriate and the requirements when a client enters into such an agreement.
the wife had originally instructed the firm Payne Hicks Beach before instructing the firm Sears Tooth
the wife instructed Sears Tooth to contest Payne Hicks Beach’s bill and issued negligence proceedings against Payne Hicks Beach
because the maintenance pending suit order took the wife’s disposable income beyond legal aid eligibility limits, she executed a deed of assignment agreeing to assign her rights under a lump sum order
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers the different categories of contractual damages that may be available for financial loss (pecuniary loss), ie expectation-based damages, reliance-based damages and gains-based damages.For guidance on contractual damages generally, see Practice Note: Contractual
What are OFTOs?Offshore Transmission Owners (OFTOs) are the owners of offshore transmission assets which connect offshore wind farms to the onshore electricity network. The transmission assets comprise everything between the offshore point of connection with the generating wind farm assets and the
Fraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the deceived for the Fraud Act 2006
For guidance on the basic features of the doctrine of estoppel and the different classifications it has been subject to, see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead and related content.Promissory estoppel—what is it?Where A has, by words or conduct, made to B a clear and unequivocal
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.