The following Property practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
One of the most common management schemes adopted by developers of residential flats is for the developer to retain the reversionary interest but to contract out the management and provision of services to a management company. Under this form of scheme, the developer can continue to collect the ground rents reserved under the flat leases, but divest itself of the ongoing management obligations under the landlord covenants in the flat leases.
The developer has three options in these circumstances:
a tenants' management company
a professional management company
an associated company controlled by the developer
Under this arrangement:
the entirety of the development is divided between the flat leases; consequently, there are no common parts; the building is effectively ‘sliced’ in horizontal layers, with common elements (internal staircases, external downpipes, etc) being apportioned between the various flats
each flat tenant covenants to repair its ‘slice’ of the building; whilst in theory each flat tenant could also covenant to insure its own ‘slice’, this would be administratively difficult (each flat tenant would have to be required to insure with a common insurer and on the same terms as each other) and so, in practice, the landlord will (or certainly should) insure the entire building subject to reimbursement by the flat tenants
the scheme is set up as a letting scheme, which
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note provides an introduction to intercreditor agreements and their key provisions. This Practice Note:•explains the purpose of having an intercreditor agreement and when an intercreditor agreement would be used instead of a deed of priority or subordination deed•provides links to
The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these to the company's or individual's creditors. Office-holders have various duties and powers in order to ensure that they do this. For
BREXIT: As of exit day (31 January 2020), the UK is no longer an EU Member State. However, in accordance with the Withdrawal Agreement, the UK has entered an implementation period, during which it continues to be subject to EU law. This has an impact on this Practice Note. For further guidance on
What is QOCS?Qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) was introduced on 1 April 2013 as part of the Jackson costs reforms following the removal of a claimant’s right to recover additional liabilities from the defendant, ie success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums. The relevant CPR
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.