The following Property guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In Smith v Eric S Bush, the House of Lords held that a valuer who reports on a property for a prospective mortgagee, knowing that a prospective purchaser is likely to rely on his report when deciding whether or not to buy the property, owes a duty of care to that purchaser.
Knowledge, on the part of a valuer, that a purchaser is likely to rely on his valuation, is more likely to be implied where the property valued is comparatively cheap. There is less likelihood that the purchaser will commission a separate valuation. However, reliance may be implied in relation to more expensive properties where the evidence and circumstances warrant it (eg to avoid additional cost of mortgagee’s valuer, a purchaser instructs his own valuer, who had surveyed the property previously, to carry out the valuation; the purchaser then relies on valuer’s insurance reinstatement valuation figure rather than his own).
A purchaser can rely on a valuer’s report, even if it is not shown to him, where it is reasonable for him to assume from the mortgage offer that the property has been valued at no less than the amount in the offer.
In Merrett v Babb, the Court of Appeal held that a valuer owed a personal duty of care to the mortgagor for a negligent valuation report.
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234