The following Employment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note examines the legal and practical issues that may arise when an employer (referred to in this note as the 'new employer') seeks to recruit an individual or, in a team move scenario, a group of individuals, from a competitor employer (referred to in this note as the 'former employer' or 'current employer').
The basis of litigation in employee competition situations will be the express and implied terms of the contract of employment between the employee(s) and the current employer, or, if the employee has already left, the former employer.
Obviously, the new employer is not a party to that contract of employment. Nor does it owe any direct duties to the current/former employer of the employee it wishes to recruit. However, it may nonetheless be made a party to in any litigation involving the target employee as a result of the operation of the economic torts.
The relevance of these tortious claims in employee competition situations is that they provide a direct cause of action for the former employer against the recruiting employer—the target employee does not even need to be party to the proceedings (although often the former employer will bring proceedings against relevant individual employees as well).
This will appeal to the former employer, as the new employer will almost certainly have greater financial resources than the individual employee(s) and therefore
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note deals with the relationships arising between principals, agents and third parties with whom the agent deals on the principal’s behalf. It considers the principal’s liability for its agent, agent’s authority including remedies for breach of authority, fraud and misrepresentation,
Defending a tort claim—general considerationsIn reality, many claims are ‘defended’ on the basis that the defendant either did not owe the claimant a duty, or there was no breach of duty or there was a break in the chain of causation.In each of those cases, the claimant has failed to establish that
Tipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities so that they could take steps to cover up their misdeeds or disappear.
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day, ie Friday 31 January 2020, has implications for practitioners considering service out of the jurisdiction. For guidance, see: Cross border considerations—checklist—Service—Brexit specific.This Practice Note explains when an acknowledgment of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.