The following Public Law practice note produced in partnership with Kim Mayo of Essex County Council provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Since the introduction of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR 2004), SI 2004/3391, there have been arguments that their provisions have caused a chilling effect on the frank and open communications taking place within public authorities obliged to comply with them.
Arguments of the chilling effect are normally put forward as part of the public interest considerations advanced under section 35 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) (formulations of government policy etc) but could also be seen under FIA 2000, s 36 (prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs) and Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR 2004), SI 2004/3391, reg 12(4)(e) (exceptions to the duty to disclose environmental information).
The arguments focus on the need to protect the internal deliberation and decision making process.
Public authorities have sought to argue that if they were obliged to disclose details of internal discussions it would inhibit the free and frank discussions necessary to advance the debate. This, it is suggested, would in turn damage the quality of advice provided and lead to a decline in the quality of decision making and policy development, whilst also impacting on the quality and willingness to commit advice and views to writing.
The tribunal has described these arguments as a ‘risk to candour and boldness in the giving of advice which the
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
What is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.Final judgments by
Community order requirementsCommunity order requirements are set out in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003), as amended by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 (ORA 2014). Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 152(2)
Part 8 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009 (CTA 2009) is a specific corporation tax regime that applies exclusively to the gains and losses of intangible fixed assets. Note, however, that certain intangible fixed assets are excluded from the regime, see Practice Note: Excluded intangible fixed
Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and considered against the general background of
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.