The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
A proprietary remedy is one which attaches to specific property (as opposed to a ‘personal remedy’ ie a damages claim for money).
That is not to say then when considering proprietary remedies, the property in question cannot be money; it can, as seen in the leading authority on proprietary claims of Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale (see below).
Where a proprietary remedy is sought, it is usually because the defendant themselves are either insolvent or no longer have the property. In such cases, the claimant may need to ‘follow’ and/or ‘trace’ the property in order to make recovery. How, when and against which parties a claimant can trace their misappropriated property depends on whether the claimant seeks to trace their property at common law or in equity, as discussed below.
Where the defendant has received property which, either at law or in equity, traceably belongs to the claimant, then a proprietary claim may follow. A claimant who wishes to bring a proprietary claim must establish not only that the defendant received property which belongs to them, but that the defendant still retains that property and that the case is one in which the grant of a proprietary remedy is justified.
Thus, proprietary claims are those in which the claimant claims to have:
a proprietary (ownership) interest
in specific property
which is in the hands of
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished responsibility or suicide
Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine (see Practice Note: The doctrine of res judicata). In addition to the general key requirements for establishing a res judicata (see Practice Note: Key requirements to establish a res judicata), this Practice Note considers the specific
STOP PRESS: The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contains provisions which, on a temporary basis (presently until 31 December 2020) impose significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For further reading, see Practice Note: Corporate
Background to the Single RulebookHistorically, the European Commission (Commission) favours using Directives (rather than Regulations) to set out its legislation in respect of the financial services sector. However, Directives, allowing Member States greater flexibility in how they implement
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.