The following Dispute Resolution practice note produced in partnership with Nicholas Macklam of Radcliffe Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.
For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:
Estoppel and property law
Mortgages by estoppel
Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead) which cannot ordinarily found a cause of action, proprietary estoppel can. It is typically used where a party (B) seeks to assert a proprietary right to land belonging to another party (A) in circumstances where B has been lead to believe, by a promise, words or conduct and/or by acquiescence from A, that they (B) have or can expect to acquire an interest in the land.
The decisions in Ramsden v Dyson and Willmott v Barber provide an appropriate starting point for an understanding of the doctrine. Both were cases where the claimant sought to establish a proprietary interest in someone else's property on the basis that the claimant had spent money on the property in the belief that it was theirs and in circumstances where that belief had been encouraged by the true owner passively standing by without intervening (Ramsden v Dyson and Thornton (1866) LR 1 HL 129, not reported by LexisNexis®).
Cases of this nature can usefully be described as 'acquiescence' cases. See Fisher v Brooker, where Lord Neuberger said (page ) that:
‘The classic example of proprietary estoppel, standing
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Property: [insert name and/or address of the Property] (‘Property’)Purchaser: [insert name, address and (if applicable) company registration number of buyer]Transaction: [insert brief details]1Executive summary1.1Scope of reportThis report is addressed to you [insert buyer’s name] and has been
Convention rights—structure of qualified rightsThe rights preserved under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as set out in the Human Rights Act 1998 Sch 1, can be broadly divided into three groups:•absolute rights—which cannot be interfered with by the state or derogated from even in a
Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs)BREXIT: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 (‘IP completion day’) marked the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. Following IP completion day, key transitional arrangements come to an end and
Judicial review—time limits and the pre-action protocolWhen considering whether and how to bring a claim for judicial review, the first step is to consider whether judicial review is be an appropriate means of addressing the issues raised by the case at hand. For further guidance, see Practice Note:
0330 161 1234