The following Practice Compliance practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note reflects draft Legal Sector Affinity Group (LSAG) AML guidance, published on 20 January 2021. It awaits HM Treasury approval. Note that any content may be amended before the final version is published with the Treasury’s approval.
Privilege is a vital consideration when deciding whether to make a suspicious activity report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency (NCA) under the relevant provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) and the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000).
There are three essential issues:
whether making a suspicious activity report to the NCA will breach client confidentiality
whether it will breach the client's right to legal professional privilege (LPP), and
whether the privileged circumstances defence applies to a potential money laundering offence
This is a hugely complex area of law. This Practice Note explains privilege as it applies to the AML and CTF regime only. Wider privilege issues are not covered here. You'll find more general information on LPP in subtopic: Client privilege.
You are under a strict professional and legal duty to keep your clients' affairs confidential. Protecting your client's confidential information is a fundamental feature of your duty to your client. The duty continues beyond the end of the retainer and the client's death. The circumstances in which you are able to disclose client information to any third party,
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Direct effect of EU lawWhat is direct effect of EU law?The doctrine of direct effect is a fundamental principle of EU law developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Van Gend en Loos. It is a mechanism through which individuals can enforce rights in Member States’ courts, based on EU
Interim injunctions—the American Cyanamid guidelinesThis Practice Note is concerned with substantive interim injunctions, which are a particular species of injunction granted on a temporary basis ahead of trial. As set out below, there are different considerations depending on whether the interim
Pre-action disclosure—the applicationThis Practice Note provides guidance on CPR 31.16 pre-action disclosure applications, where the applicant and respondent are likely to be parties to subsequent proceedings. It provides guidance on how to make such an application for disclosure before proceedings
Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice
0330 161 1234