The following Corporate Crime guidance note Produced in partnership with Thomas Evans of 3 Paper Buildings provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
Perverting the course of justice is a common law offence which can only be tried on indictment in the Crown Court. The elements of the offence are:
a person acts or embarks on a course of conduct
which has a tendency to
and is intended to
pervert the course of public justice
The offence requires a positive act or series of acts; omission or simple inaction is insufficient (eg failing to point out a mistake).
Acts tending (and intended) to obstruct, divert or disrupt criminal proceedings or police investigations generally may suffice—the offence does not need to have taken place in respect of a particular trial or investigation.
The fact that an attempt to pervert the course of justice ultimately fails does not prevent a prosecution provided that the accused’s actions have created a risk, without further action by them, that injustice would result.
The prosecution must prove either an intent to pervert the course of justice or an intent to do something which if achieved, would pervert the course of justice.
In R v Kellett, the court held that the offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice would not necessarily be committed by a person who tried
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234