The following Dispute Resolution Q&A Produced in partnership with James Tunley of Lamb Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
In addition to paragraph 8.4 of the Pre-action Protocol for Professional Negligence (the Protocol), paragraph 10 of the Protocol deals with documents in more detail. It states that the early exchange of relevant information is encouraged so that issues in dispute can be clarified or resolved. The claimant should provide ‘key documents’ with the letter of claim, as should the professional with the letter of response, and both parties should provide any other documents that are reasonably requested.
Paragraph 10 of the Protocol also states that the Protocol should not be used to justify a fishing expedition by either party and that no party is obliged to disclose any document which a court could not order them to disclose under CPR 31.16.
Clearly, the document requests must be relevant. The scope of disclosure, and therefore any request for documents, should not go wider than CPR 31.6, requiring disclosure of the documents on which the party relies, which adversely affect either side's case or which support the other side's case.
It is also worth bearing in mind CPR 31.16(3)(d) and the circumstances where it would be desirable for the court to make an order for pre-action disclosure. Those a
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what,
This Practice Note examines:•why negative pledge clauses are used in commercial transactions •the consequences of breaching negative pledge provisions•how negative pledges are viewed in the context of security and quasi-security, and•key considerations when drafting a negative pledge clauseWhere
What is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House of Lords decision in Re G
Brexit: The UK's departure from the EU on exit day ie Friday 31 January 2020 has implications for practitioners dealing with provisions in the CPR relevant to cross border matters, including CPR 5.4C (discussed below). For guidance on the impact of Brexit on the CPR, see Cross border
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.