The following TMT practice note produced in partnership with Bristows provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
One certainty of any outsourcing deal is that it will end. So while not planning for failure, outsourcing contracts should be structured so that they address the need for an orderly move to the next stage after their termination (whether for convenience or due to a default) or on their planned expiry date.
Addressing the exit process in the outsourcing contract is essential.
Furthermore it is vital that the customer holds the supplier to its contractual obligations to plan for exit during the term of the contract such that it can be quickly invoked in the event of termination or expiry.
Doing so should mean that:
both parties (and any new or successor supplier) find themselves in a better position following the exit or service transfer than if these matters are not addressed, and
even if the exit process does become contentious (as it often does), a well laid out set of exit obligations, and a clear understanding as to the costs, ought to assist the parties in resolving issues
The key concern that needs to be addressed at the end of an outsourcing contract is the danger of failing to ensure a smooth transfer from an incumbent supplier to either a new supplier (a re-tendering or second-generation deal) or back in-house to the customer (so-called in-sourcing).
Failing to address this issue exposes the
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step.
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
RobberyRobberyRobbery is a theft offence, involving dishonesty but elevated also by the intention to use force.Robbery can only be tried in the Crown Court on indictment and is categorised as a class 3 offence.Elements of the offence of robberyA person is guilty of robbery if:•they steal something,
Joint, several, and joint and several liabilityContractWhere a contract is made by two or more parties it may contain a promise or obligation made by two or more of those parties. Any such promise may be:•joint•several, or•joint and severalWhether an undertaking is joint, several, or joint and
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)—snapshotTitleUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)Parties168Adopted10 December 1982Entry into Force16 November 1994Full textUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaSubject [Catchwords]International Law of the
Common law offence of false imprisonmentThe offence of false imprisonmentFalse imprisonment is a common law offence but it is more common as a civil action in tort (see Practice Note: False imprisonment).It is triable only on indictment. It may be classified in class 2A, 2B or 3 in accordance with
0330 161 1234