The following Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This Practice Note considers what ‘negotiating damages’ (previously sometimes known as Wrotham Park damages) are, when they may be available as a remedy for contractual breach and what the court will take into account when assessing them.
For guidance on the remedy of damages, see Practice Note: The remedy of damages—general principles.
For guidance on the general principles for claiming damages for contractual breach and the distinction between claiming for pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses, see Practice Notes:
Contractual damages—general principles
Contractual damages—pecuniary losses
Contractual damages—non-pecuniary losses
Negotiating damages are damages which are assessed by reference to the sum that the claimant could reasonably have charged for releasing the defendant from the obligation which the latter failed to perform (the hypothetical release). This is in contrast to the general compensatory nature of contractual damages which entails an assessment of the loss actually caused by reference to the difference between the claimant’s actual position and the position he would have been in had the contract been performed.
‘Negotiating damages’ is a relatively new term—Lord Reed in Morris-Garner v One Step propounded its use for that category of cases where damages can be awarded for breach of contract where the loss suffered by the claimant is appropriately measured by reference to the economic value of the right which has been breached, considered as an asset. That may be
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
When defendants are guilty, they have a choice to plead guilty or to put the prosecution to proof. When they plead guilty they may benefit from a reduction in their sentence as a result, see Practice Note: Credit for guilty plea. However, the Sentencing Council's overarching guidelines on reduction
Dividends involve a distribution of cash or a distribution of non-cash assets (known as a distribution in kind or a distribution in specie).A scrip dividend (in a tax context, sometimes referred to as a stock dividend) allows a shareholder to receive new shares in a company as an alternative to a
There are two kinds of burden:•the legal burden, and•the evidential burdenThe legal burdenA party has the legal (sometimes called ‘the persuasive’) burden where the onus is on that party to prove a fact or issue in a case to the required standard of proof.The legal burden is generally on the
Definition of automatismAn act is done in a state of automatism if it is done by the body without control by the mind, (eg it is a spasm or a reflex), or if it is done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing. The act may be described as involuntary, but will not be regarded as such
0330 161 1234
To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial.