The following Planning guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering:
This note is based on the assumptions that:
HE is the relevant authority and the works in question affect the strategic road network, and
the reader is acting for the developer
Practice Note: Negotiating a s 278 agreement—the Highway Agency's perspective is based on the assumption that the reading is acting for HE.
See precedent: Precedent s 278 agreement.
Developers must initially persuade HE that the s 278 works will be of benefit to the public.
It is common practice for the HA to provide the first draft of the agreement.
The developer must undertake to be responsible for all costs incurred by HE.
Unfortunately for the developer, there is little negotiation space in relation to the costs of the agreement or the carrying out of the works. The developer is responsible for the:
administration fee, which covers HE’s costs for the design, preparation and monitoring of the works, and
a commuted sum, which should be sufficient to cover the future maintenance of the new strategic road infrastructure
Staged payments may be scheduled and provision for potential uplift may be made to allow for the fact that costs may be higher than originally envisaged. The detail of the works will be set out in the agreement, along with mechanisms to allow for any variations that
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial.
Existing user? Sign-in
Take a free trial
Take a free trial
0330 161 1234